cricket / stats

Vital Statistics – Zimbabwe vs Bangladesh

An underrated and interesting series has just concluded. Zimbabwe hosting Bangladesh sounds fairly dull on paper, but in practice the games were hard fought examples of good test cricket. Bangladesh may have had the edge going into the series, but Zimbabwe proved that they were no pushovers. They statistically dominated the series, even if they failed to win outright.

Team Won Lost Draw Tosses Pre Series Test Wins
Zim 1 1 0 1 9
Ban 1 1 0 1 3

One of the areas where Zimbabwe were most impressive was in the batting. They displayed grit and an ability to put on long innings and partnerships. In fairness, much of that was due to the skills of captain Brendan Taylor, who put together two big scores in the first test to set up a win. The rest though performed admirably. Bangladesh struggled to put together long spells of batting, though while they were in they did score much faster.

Team Runs Average Run Rate 50s 100s Team High Score Key Batsman
Zim 1103 29.81 2.83 2 3 389 Taylor (319 runs at 106.33)
Ban 923 23.66 3.15 6 0 391 Nasir Hossain (174 runs at 58.0)

The Zimbabwean pace bowlers enjoyed their home conditions. Jarvis, Masakadza and Meth all found success. Bangledesh’s traditional reliance on spinners was exposed somewhat, though Islam performed beautifully to lead the attack.

Team O M W Strike Rate 5WI Strike Bowler Miser Workhorse
Zim 304.5 63 37 49.4 0 S Masakadza (10 wickets) Meth (Econ 1.81) Jarvis (80,16,300,9)
Ban 408.0 87 36 68.0 2 R Islam (15 wickets) Rahman (Econ 2.36) Islam (110, 28, 293, 15)

Partnerships were another area where Zimbabwe had the statistical edge. One particular strength was in lower order partnerships, Zimbabwe managed to keep their tail together and extend totals.

Team Highest Partnership Best Opening Average Opening 50 100 Average lower order (7th-10th) Best lower order Sessions without wicket loss
Zim 127 (Taylor & Waller) 36 19.0 6 2 32.0 106 (Taylor & Cremer) 0
Ban 123 (Shakib & Mushfiqur) 53 31.25 4 1 12.26 51 (Hossain & Gazi) 0

First innings scores were reasonably evenly split, however in each match a strong first up total won the game. This was perhaps one area where the weakness of both teams were exposed, neither was able to overcome a poor start and fight back. It could also, however be construed as a mental strength that both teams displayed, they both managed to put in strong first days when they were put in to bat.

Team Average 1st Innings Best 1st Innings Average Lead Follow On Enforced
Zim 335.5 389 +123 0
Ban 212.5 391 -123 0

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s